Asked By – jdeng
In the numpy manual about the reshape() function, it says
>>> a = np.zeros((10, 2)) # A transpose make the array non-contiguous >>> b = a.T # Taking a view makes it possible to modify the shape without modifying the # initial object. >>> c = b.view() >>> c.shape = (20) AttributeError: incompatible shape for a non-contiguous array
My questions are:
- What are continuous and noncontiguous arrays? Is it similar to the contiguous memory block in C like What is a contiguous memory block?
- Is there any performance difference between these two? When should we use one or the other?
- Why does transpose make the array non-contiguous?
- Why does
c.shape = (20)throws an error
incompatible shape for a non-contiguous array?
Thanks for your answer!
Now we will see solution for issue: What is the difference between contiguous and non-contiguous arrays?
A contiguous array is just an array stored in an unbroken block of memory: to access the next value in the array, we just move to the next memory address.
Consider the 2D array
arr = np.arange(12).reshape(3,4). It looks like this:
In the computer’s memory, the values of
arr are stored like this:
arr is a C contiguous array because the rows are stored as contiguous blocks of memory. The next memory address holds the next row value on that row. If we want to move down a column, we just need to jump over three blocks (e.g. to jump from 0 to 4 means we skip over 1,2 and 3).
Transposing the array with
arr.T means that C contiguity is lost because adjacent row entries are no longer in adjacent memory addresses. However,
arr.T is Fortran contiguous since the columns are in contiguous blocks of memory:
Performance-wise, accessing memory addresses which are next to each other is very often faster than accessing addresses which are more “spread out” (fetching a value from RAM could entail a number of neighbouring addresses being fetched and cached for the CPU.) This means that operations over contiguous arrays will often be quicker.
As a consequence of C contiguous memory layout, row-wise operations are usually faster than column-wise operations. For example, you’ll typically find that
np.sum(arr, axis=1) # sum the rows
is slightly faster than:
np.sum(arr, axis=0) # sum the columns
Similarly, operations on columns will be slightly faster for Fortran contiguous arrays.
Finally, why can’t we flatten the Fortran contiguous array by assigning a new shape?
>>> arr2 = arr.T >>> arr2.shape = 12 AttributeError: incompatible shape for a non-contiguous array
In order for this to be possible NumPy would have to put the rows of
arr.T together like this:
shape attribute directly assumes C order – i.e. NumPy tries to perform the operation row-wise.)
This is impossible to do. For any axis, NumPy needs to have a constant stride length (the number of bytes to move) to get to the next element of the array. Flattening
arr.T in this way would require skipping forwards and backwards in memory to retrieve consecutive values of the array.
If we wrote
arr2.reshape(12) instead, NumPy would copy the values of arr2 into a new block of memory (since it can’t return a view on to the original data for this shape).
This question is answered By – Alex Riley
This answer is collected from stackoverflow and reviewed by FixPython community admins, is licensed under cc by-sa 2.5 , cc by-sa 3.0 and cc by-sa 4.0